Tapan S. Parikh, Jenna Burrell, and Coye Cheshire, UC Berkeley School of Information
Several researchers have noted that all financial transactions are not simply discrete exchanges of value, but also carry rich meaning that is socially and culturally constructed. Current mobile phone cash transfer mechanisms only support discrete exchanges of either airtime or money, usually via an intermediary. Any additional information or sentiment must be conveyed via a "back-channel" between the sender and the recipient, often requiring a separate conversation.
This mechanism does not currently support all the exchanges that are socially and culturally valued. For example, in Uganda, one important tradition involves the regular sending of food to one's parents. Because the existing airtime-based transfer mechanism cannot convey this message of responsibility, migrants often must resort to buying food and sending it to their parents via taxi, incurring additional cost, but allowing for a meaning-rich exchange that is visible to the community. A recent study in Ghana found that 16% of remittances were given as food, and 23% as other goods [see Mazzucato, Valentina; van den Boom, Bart; Nsowah-Nuamah, N.N.N., “Remittances in Ghana: Origin, Destination and Issues of Measurement”, International Migration, 46(1), Mar. 2008, pp. 103-122(20)]. This is remarkable considering the relative difficulty and expense of such transfers. In fact, such exchanges form an essential part of the social safety net in countries lacking national support for social welfare.
Communications has a proven demand that could be used to bootstrap other services. Current users of communications services (often SMS) are likely to be the next adopters of mobile cash transfers. If they don’t own a phone, they must rely on their friends, neighbors or relatives with access to a device (perhaps using their own SIM card). A local airtime retailer could provide the service of sending and receiving messages, both text and voice (and perhaps also video). If this retailer also provides cash transfer, successfully sending and receiving a number of messages may instill the trust needed to use this more risky service.
Based on theory and a first-hand empirical understanding, in close cooperation with potential users and implementing institutions, we will design and implement a new set of transaction mechanisms to better support the practices we have observed. We speculate that some of these might be “rich transactions”, in that they support a richer exchange of information and sentiment then is possible using current mechanisms. A few preliminary examples:
- Transferring non-cash goods, including food and other goods, possibly through local vendors equipped with mobile phones. In addition to fulfilling filial obligations, this could also provide local business opportunities.
- Bundling of short audio (or video) messages along with the monetary transfer, explaining the intent and/or terms of the transaction. We could also allow responses, perhaps to express gratitude or reciprocity.
- Reputation mechanisms for agents, allowing for more informed calculations of risk.
We believe that novel transaction mechanisms could better support the rich sentiments behind many socially motivated exchanges. Given appropriate institutions and technology (a local provisions shop vendor with a mobile phone, for example), such exchanges could also be handled more efficiently.
About the first author
Tapan Parikh is an assistant professor at the UC Berkeley School of Information. Tapan's research interests include human-computer interaction (HCI), user interfaces for semi-literate users, mobile computing and information systems for microfinance, smallholder agriculture and global health. He holds a Sc.B. degree in Molecular Modeling with Honors from Brown University, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from the University of Washington. Tapan was named Technology Review magazine's Humanitarian of the Year in 2007, for his work bringing accessible mobile information services to microfinance groups in rural India.
Tepan Parikh presented on 'Increasing Trust in Mobile Correspondent Banking", using an in-depth description of Kenya's M-PESA program. He first noted that the rapid diffusion of digital money forms are largely in the urban areas of the developed and developing world, but are still limited in the poorer and more remote regions in the developing world. Because of the strong normative banking needs in these places, especially in remittance sending/receipt, there is need for hearty observation of the processes of correspondent banking processes. Because the people in the most rural regions tend to be less digitally literate, there exist several opportunities for correspondent banking abuse, exposing private information. For one, the agent has a weak relationship with the institution s/he represents, since there is no teller. Second, agents may monopolize underserved areas. And third, the agent is operating in unfamiliar environments, including changing relationship, technological and institutional dynamics.
He detailed how the M-PESA banking process works. Basically, the system works by clients registering (bearing authorized identification and a SIM card) with an M-PESA agent and depositing cash. Both the agent and client receive an SMS text message verifying the deposit record. The money sender uses the application to send to a destination phone number, referencing an account number and PIN code. Withdrawal does not require membership, but in short receiver gets an SMS text with the code to complete the transaction, and both the receiver and that agent get confirmation messages as well.
Within the process, a few operational concerns were made evident. For example, clients tend not to trust the agents and technology while they do trust the institution (Safaricom). To address this, Parikh suggested an agent rating system based on client satisfaction with phone transaction, that would operate like Ebay vendor ratings. He emphasized that paper trails could ensure honest auditing for dispute claims.
Another problem encountered by many presenters was that agents often had limited liquidity when needing to disburse transfers, especially in rural areas. Solutions for this problem require increased accountability by institutions to assure trustworthiness with access to funds.
Several participants had questions about the government regulations of these programs, and whether they had to work within them, or whether governments are attentive to the formal-informal monetary flows. As of now, these issues are up for debate for future government intervention, and how the National Payments Bill should and will be able to monitor decentralized banking transactions.
Can we rethink these models outside the regulatory, deposit-taking institution framework?
Posted by: EDMBloggerCrystal | September 22, 2008 at 02:20 PM